By Trevor Brown
Dr. Robert Malone appeared in an interview with Joe Rogan the other day. The Doctor spoke of his expertise in the field of bio-medicine and his lifetime experience including his role in developing the very mRNA technology that the covid-19 vaccines revolve around. At the very least Doctor Malone seems to be one of the most qualified people to speak of the manner at hand. However, that would assume Civil society and the public square have not been slowly eroding as it has.
The video above explains how Big tech works in conjunction with multinational conglomerates and “harmonizes with” the Corporate media in order to silence the “narrative”. This is concerning for a number of factors but the main one is that any job manned by an animal or a machine will have flaws. Human beings are no different and it follows that any and all actions. We humans or things we humans use to automate any process for us will have flaws. Likewise, silicon valley’s disinformation algorithms are no different. In-fact these platforms have admitted in some form or another that this is the case. Facebook when they filed in a court of law under oath that their fact checkers qualify as “Protected opinion” and the new CEO of twitter once said in an interview that our (twitter’s) role is to not “be bound by the first amendment“. Which is a clear indicator that at the very least twitter has editorial policies.
Why and What caused this?
Fundamentally, the reason we are experiencing this is because of a far-left critical theorist who created the concept of Repressive tolerance. This axiom of critical theorists is used to subvert institutions to be more political. After-all, if you believe the “personal is political”. Which Critical Theorists certainly do. Then any person or institution cannot claim their actions to be non-political. This explains the phenomena of cancel culture, the rise of blue anon,…etc and I would imagine those who believe in a civil society have naturally found their inclination to reject this outright. Moreover, those who reject this axiom should understand that they are correct. Your relationships are not political and nobody should tell you otherwise. A better way of phrasing this would be to say “the personal can be political”. Or, rather their are aspects of ones personal life that can be politicized. That statement is much more accurate and gives people an opportunity to lead happy, healthy, and normal lives. However, the critical theorists (which lets be clear are revolutionary Marxists that state in no uncertain terms are carrying out the “German Marxist tradition”.) would have a problem with that. In-fact if you were to talk to someone who believes this axiom you may even be called some names. Name calling is the favorite pastime of these radicals. In-fact books like “rules for radicals”. Tell the reader in no uncertain terms that they should always be on the offense and never on the defense. That they need to make the opposition to be the devil incarnate or they will fail.
The axiom in question was taught to university students in the early 60’s. These students then became the heads of society all across america who then taught their children and their children taught their children etc. As is probably the same for those who are religious and that is exactly how we should treat them. Treat these critical theorists as if they are a religious force colonizing institutions. After-all what is colonization if not violence and subversion in pursuit of social aims?
First Decentralize your presence in the public square:
Why should you decentralize your social media presence?
What you could replace your not so trusty silicon valley platforms with?
Civil society and the public square is one of the many things that as has been promised to us by this great republic. However, this is slowly being taken away from us with the consolidation of Government and Monopolistic power. However, this Monopoly is slowly being eroded and you have the power to participate in that. Below are two articles I have written about my personal experience. As both a content consumer and content creator with a total of 7 liberty platforms. These platforms being 4 YouTube alternatives and 3 twitter alternatives.
Take that decentralized presence and learn to build spaces. Start a business, volunteer at your community center/church,…etc. Build communities faster than far left activists can destroy them. If the race radicals violently pillage them (like they did in the summer of 2020) then that will be incredibly useful.
It is OK to create exclusive spaces and I don’t mean golf courses, yacht clubs,…etc. As an example I would say it is OK for people in a star wars club to talk exclusively or mainly about star wars. After-all it would be meaningless if this hypothetical club started talking about trump hats, because this space (the star wars club) is a particular space designed to achieve a particular end. This hypothetical club has no need and (quite frankly) no room for race radicalism as it has no room for Trump hats. This of course can be extrapolated further until we restore civil society.
This article is part of an ongoing series on Blue-Anon.